Diachronic Diversity in Classical Biblical Hebrew

Aaron D. Hornkohl
Open Book Publishers
2024-11-11

According to the standard periodisation of ancient Hebrew, the division of Biblical Hebrew as reflected in the Masoretic tradition is basically dichotomous: pre-exilic Classical Biblical Hebrew (CBH) versus post-Restoration Late Biblical Hebrew (LBH). Within this paradigm, the chronolectal unity of CBH is rarely questioned—this despite the reasonable expectation that the language of a corpus encompassing traditions of various ages and comprising works composed, edited, and transmitted over the course of centuries would show signs of diachronic development. From the perspective of historical evolution, CBH is remarkably homogenous. Within this apparent uniformity, however, there are indeed signs of historical development, sets of alternant features whose respective concentrations seem to divide CBH into two sub-chronolects. The most conspicuous typological division that emerges is between the CBH of the Pentateuch and that of the relevant Prophets and Writings. The present volume investigates a series of features that distinguish the two ostensible CBH sub-chronolects, weighs alternative explanations for distribution patterns that appear to have chronological significance, and considers broader implications for Hebrew diachrony and periodisation and for the composition of the Torah.

Metadata Formats

Publisher Links

Included in Packages

Keywords

  • Criticism and exegesis of sacred texts
  • Criticism and exegesis of sacred texts
  • Hebrew
  • Historical and comparative linguistics
  • Historical and comparative linguistics
  • Criticism and exegesis of sacred texts
  • Historical Hebrew language
  • Language evolution
  • Textual analysis
  • Old Testaments
  • Classical Biblical Hebrew
  • Diachronic linguistics
  • PJ4527
  • Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures
  • Linguistics

Diachronic Diversity in Classical Biblical Hebrew

Aaron D. Hornkohl

Open Book Publishers

2024-11-11

CC BY-NC

According to the standard periodisation of ancient Hebrew, the division of Biblical Hebrew as reflected in the Masoretic tradition is basically dichotomous: pre-exilic Classical Biblical Hebrew (CBH) versus post-Restoration Late Biblical Hebrew (LBH). Within this paradigm, the chronolectal unity of CBH is rarely questioned—this despite the reasonable expectation that the language of a corpus encompassing traditions of various ages and comprising works composed, edited, and transmitted over the course of centuries would show signs of diachronic development. From the perspective of historical evolution, CBH is remarkably homogenous. Within this apparent uniformity, however, there are indeed signs of historical development, sets of alternant features whose respective concentrations seem to divide CBH into two sub-chronolects. The most conspicuous typological division that emerges is between the CBH of the Pentateuch and that of the relevant Prophets and Writings. The present volume investigates a series of features that distinguish the two ostensible CBH sub-chronolects, weighs alternative explanations for distribution patterns that appear to have chronological significance, and considers broader implications for Hebrew diachrony and periodisation and for the composition of the Torah.

Download Formats

Included in Packages

Topics

  • Criticism and exegesis of sacred texts
  • Criticism and exegesis of sacred texts
  • Hebrew
  • Historical and comparative linguistics
  • Historical and comparative linguistics
  • Criticism and exegesis of sacred texts
  • Historical Hebrew language
  • Language evolution
  • Textual analysis
  • Old Testaments
  • Classical Biblical Hebrew
  • Diachronic linguistics
  • PJ4527
  • Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures
  • Linguistics